InsaneJ

Apple makes bad apology

Rate this Entry
Name:  GuiltyBaby.jpg
Views: 146
Size:  19.1 KB

A little while ago Apple lost it's appeal against the UK High Court of Justice ruling and was ordered to post a public apology to Samsung. It had to post it giant Arial.

Well then, the apology has arrived. It's not very long, but long enough to be one of the worst apologies in history.

The first part basically sais that Samsung didn't copy Apple because the iPad is cool and the Galaxy Tab isn't. And the second part goes on to point fingers at others that agree with Apple in saying Samsung did copy them.

Here's the "apology":
Samsung / Apple UK judgment

On 9th July 2012 the High Court of Justice of England and Wales ruled that Samsung Electronic (UK) Limited’s Galaxy Tablet Computer, namely the Galaxy Tab 10.1, Tab 8.9 and Tab 7.7 do not infringe Apple’s registered design No. 0000181607-0001. A copy of the full judgment of the High court is available on the following link www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Patents/2012/1882.html.

In the ruling, the judge made several important points comparing the designs of the Apple and Samsung products:

"The extreme simplicity of the Apple design is striking. Overall it has undecorated flat surfaces with a plate of glass on the front all the way out to a very thin rim and a blank back. There is a crisp edge around the rim and a combination of curves, both at the corners and the sides. The design looks like an object the informed user would want to pick up and hold. It is an understated, smooth and simple product. It is a cool design."

"The informed user's overall impression of each of the Samsung Galaxy Tablets is the following. From the front they belong to the family which includes the Apple design; but the Samsung products are very thin, almost insubstantial members of that family with unusual details on the back. They do not have the same understated and extreme simplicity which is possessed by the Apple design. They are not as cool."

That Judgment has effect throughout the European Union and was upheld by the Court of Appeal on 18 October 2012. A copy of the Court of Appeal’s judgment is available on the following link www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2012/1339.html. There is no injunction in respect of the registered design in force anywhere in Europe.

However, in a case tried in Germany regarding the same patent, the court found that Samsung engaged in unfair competition by copying the iPad design. A U.S. jury also found Samsung guilty of infringing on Apple's design and utility patents, awarding over one billion U.S. dollars in damages to Apple Inc. So while the U.K. court did not find Samsung guilty of infringement, other courts have recognized that in the course of creating its Galaxy tablet, Samsung willfully copied Apple's far more popular iPad.
Now I understand Apple is a company, and not a person. If a person would make an apology like that he'd get some more punishment. What can happen to Apple in this case? Is this something you could legally consider as the apology the judge intended?

Submit "Apple makes bad apology" to Twitter Submit "Apple makes bad apology" to Facebook Submit "Apple makes bad apology" to Digg Submit "Apple makes bad apology" to Google Submit "Apple makes bad apology" to del.icio.us Submit "Apple makes bad apology" to StumbleUpon

Categories
Tech

Comments

  1. demman8's Avatar
    That? An apology? Nope.